Carlos Fonseca, Assistant Secretary of the Sandinista National Liberation Front was surprised that" Revolutionary ", monarchists and imperialists agree on the criminalization of Libyan regime (when the logic is that both are on different side and that the anti-imperialists are always anathematized or, at least those who oppose their interests.) Also, remember that the defenders of "Western freedoms" to oppose what they call a "Muslim tyranny" that, however, has claimed the Libyan women.
is clear that all the lies that are said about Libya have ended up contradicting and revealing, as we stand and as has also defended the FSLN (and other communist parties and governments involved in defending their revolution against imperialist aggression ), which is already too well known in the history of socialism: the existence of some parties and tendencies that have always worked, consciously or incosncientemente, with the interests of capitalism, and that Libya has again unmasked.
" is curious that the" revolutionaries "who oppose Libyan Gaddafi and the Libyan town or state, raise the flag of the monarchy, and the defenders of the" tyranny "lift Flag of direct democracy and the rule of the people. But there who has even compare what is happening today in the Arab world with the overthrow of the Russian Czar in February 1917, which preceded the triumph of the first socialist revolution ever, in October of that year (perhaps because the time of delivering such a rash opinion had not happened as of Libya, where one of the claims against Gaddafi is the restoration of the monarchy, on the contrary to the case of Russia mentioned here, apart from that rebellions are occurring not just against the Arab monarchies, but against the autocracies and the Libyan case against the State of the Village which is precisely the denial of any autocracy, which is why Libyan opponents precisely that claim rather absolute monarchy), but not accordance with this, some apologists of the riots Arab Arabic forecast a possible October this year, neglecting inter alia the detail that there is no organized art can become truly revolutionary speed situations that have arisen in countries such as Tunisia and Egypt (having been precisely the situation analysis revolutionary and avant-garde need to turn this situation to the revolution, the main contribution to revolutionary theory made the leader of the October Revolution in Russia, Vladimir I. Lenin), and it is almost impossible for that art displayed in such little time or even within a short enough so that there already passed the appropriate time to promote the changes necessary. Never before this time, I had more desire to be wrong, but I've rarely been so convinced of being right ...
Against which have revolted the Libyan regime's opponents, who raise the flag of the monarchy? Libya is the country with the highest per capita income in Africa, with a social justice system installed since the triumph of the Revolution under the leadership of Muammar Gaddafi in 1969, is the Islamic country where women are in a better situation, are respected and treated as human beings (which does not prevent some "feminists" around here violently attack the government Libya) has promoted a policy that has offset substantially modernizing tribal culture and among other things, has championed the secular state. "Gaddafi called for the resignation? Resigned for many years and so there is no charge. To which I could not even can give is to have the leadership of the Libyan revolutionary and democratic process, why he delegated the government to represent the country in the world.
coincidence is striking that in the Libyan case is between the extreme left, and right reformism against Gaddafi. Gaddafi condemns the extreme left and the right-wing reformist governments in Europe apply sanctions against Libya, taking sides in the civil war that takes place there by blocking the acquisition of arms and ammunition by the Libyan government. There is a civil war, and all killed in combat on both sides are recorded as slaughtered by Gaddafi. It is one thing to disagree with certain policies and theories of Gaddafi, or his style of speaking, dressing or grooming, or even consider, a fool (as viewed from a Western ideocéntrica vision). In this case, it is wise ultimately no action. But joining the chorus of world reaction against whom, is the greatest act of indecency possible for anyone who claims to be revolutionary.
Libya, for that matter, a good parameter to differentiate ideological left who are being revolutionary as a way of life, and those who are left as some would prefer to spy novels to science fiction, which is not condemned, of course, but good to know who is who and to what consequences can come in the defense of revolutionary ideas, and above all, what is moral authority to talk of revolution " .
Carlos Fonseca is assistant secretary for international relations
FSLN http://socialismo-solucion.blogspot.com/2011/03/ultra-izquierda-reformismo-y-derecha.html # ixzz1HQfRWY7c
0 comments:
Post a Comment