![]() |
Revolutions citizens have a common enemy with imperialism |
left participation in imperialist aggression has existed since the communist movement became a real enemy of capitalism: after the triumph of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. Since that time, when it was shown that the left, communism, could not be limited to theoretical and protestatario role to become an alternative system in which the working class violently snatched privileges of the exploiting classes, the bourgeoisie was able to win over part of that left to their own ends.
As Troskie and his followers did not hesitate to rely on imperialist intervention in Russia to end the Soviet system, theoretically, to build from there true socialism, others suspected communists also did a great service criticizing capitalism from subsidies and participation of certain bits of power in the dictatorship of capital to the Soviet Union, to continue assisting in the destruction of his achievements since his fall.
Arab revolutions seems to have managed well the collaboration of the Left collaborator who has not hesitated from the start until the beginning of military aggression against Libya, making the spade work necessary to justify the action. At first, the revolutions of Tunisia and Egypt could give rise to doubt, questioning and appraisal of whether it actually had a high labor component and revolutionary action or whether it was typical "color revolutions", the usual formula interference in the wayward countries by imperialism as justifications for coups or, at least, surveys of the extent to succeed an attempt violent change of government.
A thing today is more than clear, and we remember those who launched the proclamation of "solidarity with the revolution It's starting to you ...", when the socialist countries suffered imperialist aggression to destroy them from within (Martens, Ludo, The Trotskyists in the service of the CIA , Rood, No. 24, 26 décembre 1989 p.1.).
While it is true that especially in Egypt, the worker has been an important component in the "citizens' revolution" (a term that already implies a high component of Western tele), in the end the goal was achieved, at the expense of the bargain price of changing the face of the ruling peon, to the image in the world that the "poor" Arabs were hungry for "democracy." Of course it was, of course, the type of democracy we have in the countries of the dictatorship of capital, limited to voting every four years and point the type of democracy that support the Euro-leftists and other grouped under the amorphous concept of "anti-capitalism" (where everything fits) and out of that label designed in the offices of media propaganda could not be anything else. For an accomplice of Eurocentric imperialism is unimaginable that an Arab people can build their own democracy, without complying with the rules of which he, in a cowardly manner, agrees.
While it is true that especially in Egypt, the worker has been an important component in the "citizens' revolution" (a term that already implies a high component of Western tele), in the end the goal was achieved, at the expense of the bargain price of changing the face of the ruling peon, to the image in the world that the "poor" Arabs were hungry for "democracy." Of course it was, of course, the type of democracy we have in the countries of the dictatorship of capital, limited to voting every four years and point the type of democracy that support the Euro-leftists and other grouped under the amorphous concept of "anti-capitalism" (where everything fits) and out of that label designed in the offices of media propaganda could not be anything else. For an accomplice of Eurocentric imperialism is unimaginable that an Arab people can build their own democracy, without complying with the rules of which he, in a cowardly manner, agrees.
That is, while those "left-wing imperialists" (this label is that neither he painted them after his shameful attitude towards the new genocide against the Libyans), submit meekly to the rules imposed by capitalism to the "democracies" are allowed, and do not call into question the social order unless the details are acceptable and can not accept that other people, adapting democracy to its own culture and customs, believe concretions other forms of government, certainly, as all criticism, but much less than democracies to those in the "civilized world" (which destroys any town that gets in his way if it is oil or benefits) are subject.
Basically we can say that the "imperialist left" that I support to end the criminal aggression against Libya, is also racist, Eurocentric, and can not understand or accept that a people to organize their own way, and less if it is subjected to these Arab dictatorships and, as it can not be otherwise, madly crave a democracy like ours (just like ours , which is not). So has spread so easily among their ranks the slogan that Gaddafi is a dictator (even without any government post), who have despised as if they had any importance to the Revolutionary Council and the Libyan militia, and have touted as automata, as they did from the beginning in its vital work anathematizing criminalization and social experiences of all kinds, Gadaffi kills his own people (not of course ask the people themselves, as they to imperialism).
This earlier, returning to the example of the support of the European left to the collapse of socialism in the East, reminiscent of the campaigns launched since September 1989 by the bourgeoisie of the Federal Republic of Germany and supported with large financial resources, with its radio and television, anti-agitation in the GDR. At that time the famous group of Mandel, an example of the attitude of the "imperialist left" of which we speak, said "a real political revolution begins" (Ibid., Inprecor, No. 296, 30 octobre - 12 novembre 1989, p.4)., although now see what it was really and what were the true aims of that revolution.
This earlier, returning to the example of the support of the European left to the collapse of socialism in the East, reminiscent of the campaigns launched since September 1989 by the bourgeoisie of the Federal Republic of Germany and supported with large financial resources, with its radio and television, anti-agitation in the GDR. At that time the famous group of Mandel, an example of the attitude of the "imperialist left" of which we speak, said "a real political revolution begins" (Ibid., Inprecor, No. 296, 30 octobre - 12 novembre 1989, p.4)., although now see what it was really and what were the true aims of that revolution.
![]() |
Those who face constant attacks imperialists are clear that means defending the people and the sovereignty of Libya |
So if something has served this crisis of Libya has certainly been to identify this kind of left, as relevant today across Europe, with great role in all campaigns and strategies against socialism and the revolutionary experiences real, and which have not ceased comfortable working from Europe in favor of revolution and far beyond, though known only too well that nobody pretended that revolution beyond the mere exchange of pawns in the countries in which the U.S. and the EU were ; interested in continuity, and they have also applauded and encouraged the criminalization without shame in the case of countries where imperialism was interested in intervening.
In fact as old as the triumph of the working class in 1917, after it has uncovered a Pandora's box that has shown what was the purpose of all media manipulation (applied on Libya to justify a crime but that of Israel, for example, have no effect), still clapping from their bourgeois salons blood shed in the name of "democracy" in which they believe and try, as does imperialism in other countries like Afghanistan or Iraq, imposed on Arab peoples by any formula design revolutions, the transformation of mercenary rebels or Islamic terrorist groups in ancient synonym for "Libyan people, or even destruction of a country and the massacres on the civilian population to which they never asked (or ask) to think about it.
Deep the exposure occurred after the process that led to the new capitalist fascism criminal aggression, this time against Libya, has been good to freshen up a little historical memory. and remind us of who on the side of the "left" (a concept too broad and amorphous, such as "popular revolution", "citizens' revolution" or "anti-capitalism", in which it anything), is against imperialism and who in their service.
0 comments:
Post a Comment