imperialist Reproduction of original text of this blog at the request of one of his commentators and followers, and which indicates the character of imperialism, and racism, much of the "Western left, unable to understand formulas adapted to different cultures and giving rise to concretions alternatives that they believe dogmatically from their classrooms but which, of course, do not fight, much less by revolutionary violence. For this "left" would be good to apply that definition with which Lenin identified these "adventurers left", or similar types of vendors interested versions of basic concepts already present in Marx and Engels and developed as the Bolshevik revolution, as "permanent revolution" with the sole purpose of criminalizing and try to overthrow the revolutionary processes in construction (as a revolution is not limited only to go out to overthrow governments, but also to build a new system). In fact today, with the conflict against Libya started weeks ago, it has become clear that while the towns where the revolutionary processes are underway in a steady defense to the permanent imperialist aggression, supported from the beginning to the Libyan people from interference of capitalism, which has used various formulas to achieve your goal, left much of the Eurocentric, Western, supported without hesitation to become "revolutionary" by work and Grace media propaganda, as if the story not so far and had not given us too many examples of how to use this type of action to try to stop governments and, especially, with sovereign nations, which control in most measurement we're used their own resources. |
Revolutions citizens have a common enemy with imperialism |
"The participation of the left in the imperialist aggressions has existed since the communist movement became a true enemy of capitalism: after the triumph of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. Since that time, when it was shown that the left, communism, could not be limited to theoretical and protestatario role to become an alternative system in which the working class violently snatched privileges of the exploiting classes, the bourgeoisie was able to attract part of that left to their own ends.
As Troskie
and his followers did not hesitate to rely on imperialist intervention in Russia to end the Soviet system, theoretically, to build from there true socialism, others suspected communists also did a great service to capitalism critique, in his role of recepetores grants and participation of certain bits of power in the dictatorship of capital, the Soviet Union, to continue assisting in the destruction of his achievements since his fall.
Arab revolutions seems to have managed well the collaboration of the Left servile has not hesitated from the start until the beginning of military aggression against Libya, making the work of undermining necessary to justify the action. At first, the revolutions of Tunisia and Egypt could give rise to doubt, questioning and appraisal of whether it actually had a high labor component and revolutionary action or whether it was typical "color revolutions", the usual formula interference in the wayward countries by imperialism, as justification for coups or, at least, surveys of the extent to succeed an attempt violent change of government.
A thing today is more than clear, and we remember those who launched the proclamation of " Solidarity revolution is starting to ...", you when the socialist countries suffered imperialist aggression to destroy them from within (Martens, Ludo, The Trotskyists in the service of the CIA , Rood, No. 24, 26 décembre 1989, p.1.).
While it is true that especially in Egypt, the worker has been an important component in the "citizens' revolution" (a term that already implies a high component of Western tele), in the end the goal was achieved at the expense of bargain prices to change the face of the ruling pawn, giving the image to the world that the "poor" Arabs were hungry for "democracy." Sure it was, of course, the type of democracy we have in the countries of the dictatorship of capital, limited to voting every four years and point the type of democracy that support the Euro-leftists and other grouped under the amorphous concept of "anti-capitalism" (where everything is possible), and out of that label designed in the Media offices could not be anything but propaganda. For an accomplice of Eurocentric imperialism is unimaginable that an Arab people can build their own democracy, without complying with the rules of which he, in a cowardly manner, agrees.
That is, while those "left-wing imperialists" (this label is that neither he painted them after his shameful attitude towards the new genocide against the Libyans), submit meekly the rules imposed by capitalism to the "democracies" are allowed, and not put into question the social order unless the details are acceptable and can not accept that other people, adapting democracy to their own culture and customs, create other types of concretions of forms of government, certainly, as all criticism, but much less than democracies to those in the "civilized world" (which destroys any town that gets in his way if it is oil or benefits) are subject.
Basically we can say that the "imperialist left," that I support to end the criminal aggression against Libya, is also racist, Eurocentric, and can not understand or accept that a people to organize their own way, and less if it is subjected to these Arab dictatorships and, as it can not be otherwise, madly crave a democracy like ours (just like ours, which is not). So has spread so easily among their ranks the slogan that Gaddafi is a dictator (even without any government post), who have despised as if they had any importance to the Revolutionary Council and the Libyan militia, and have touted as automata, as they did from the beginning in its vital work anathematizing criminalization and social experiences of all kinds, Gadaffi kills his own people (not of course ask the people themselves, as usual imperialism).
This earlier, returning to the example of the support of the European left to the collapse of socialism in the East, reminds us of the campaigns launched since September 1989 by the bourgeoisie of the Federal Republic of Germany and supported with large financial resources, with its radio and television, anti-agitation in the GDR. At that time the famous group of Mandel, an example of the attitude of the "imperialist left" of which we speak, said "a real political revolution begins" (Ibid., Inprecor, No. 296, 30 octobre - 12 novembre 1989, p.4)., but now we see what it was really and what were the true aims of that revolution.
|
Those who face constant attacks imperialists are clear that means defending the people and the sovereignty of Libya |
So if something has served this crisis of Libya has certainly been to identify this kind of left, as relevant today across Europe, with great role in all campaigns and strategies against socialism and the revolutionary experiences real, and have not stopped comfortable working from Europe in favor of revolutions alien and distant, though known only too well that nobody pretended that revolution beyond the mere exchange of pawns in the countries in which U.S. and EU were interested in continuity, and also applauded and encouraged the criminalization without shame in the case of countries where imperialism was interested in intervening.
that left
In fact as old as the triumph of the working class in 1917, after it has uncovered a Pandora's box that has shown what was the purpose of all media manipulation (applied on Libya justify a crime but that of Israel, for example, have no effect), still clapping from their bourgeois salons blood shed in the name of "democracy" in which they believe and try, as the imperialism in other countries such as Afghanistan or Iraq, imposed on the Arab peoples by any formula design revolutions, the transformation of mercenary rebels or Islamic terrorist groups in ancient synonym for "Libyan people," or even the destruction of a country and killing over the civilian population to which they never asked (or ask) to think about it.
In fact, the exposure occurred after the process has led to the criminal aggression of fascism new capitalist, this time against Libya, has been good to freshen up a little historical memory. and remind us of who on the side of the "left" (a concept too broad and amorphous, such as "popular revolution", "citizens' revolution" or "anti-capitalism", in which it anything), is against imperialism and who in his service. "